China vs Ecuador: Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score

China
74.42
in 2014
Ecuador
73.69
in 2014
China rank
58th
Ecuador rank
60th

Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score over time

  • China
  • Ecuador
020406080200420092014

How they compare

China currently reports 74.42 against 73.69 in Ecuador, a difference of 0.73.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 11 shared years of data; in 2004 it was China ahead.

China ranks 58th and Ecuador ranks 60th of 181 countries.

Ecuador has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade China Ecuador Difference Ahead
2000s 72.14 72.51 0.3709 Ecuador
2010s 73.24 74.79 1.55 Ecuador

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher registering property (db05-15 methodology) - score, China or Ecuador?
China, at 74.42 against 73.69 in Ecuador as of 2014.
What is the difference in registering property (db05-15 methodology) - score between China and Ecuador?
0.73, with China ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for China and Ecuador?
11 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2014.
How do China and Ecuador rank globally for registering property (db05-15 methodology) - score?
China ranks 58th and Ecuador ranks 60th of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
183 places, 1,968 data points, 2004–2014
Last refreshed

The score for registering property is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the procedures, time, cost to transfer property between two local companies, as well as the quality of land administration index that evaluates the reliability of infrastructure, transparency of information, geographic coverage, land dispute resolution and equal access to property rights. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB05-15 studies.