China vs Mauritania: Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score

China
74.42
in 2014
Mauritania
73.57
in 2014
China rank
58th
Mauritania rank
61st

Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score over time

  • China
  • Mauritania
020406080200420092014

How they compare

China currently reports 74.42 against 73.57 in Mauritania, a difference of 0.85.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 11 shared years of data; in 2004 it was China ahead.

China ranks 58th and Mauritania ranks 61st of 181 countries.

Across the 2 decades both report, China averaged higher in 1 and Mauritania in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade China Mauritania Difference Ahead
2000s 72.14 71.29 0.8541 China
2010s 73.24 73.37 0.1306 Mauritania

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher registering property (db05-15 methodology) - score, China or Mauritania?
China, at 74.42 against 73.57 in Mauritania as of 2014.
What is the difference in registering property (db05-15 methodology) - score between China and Mauritania?
0.85, with China ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for China and Mauritania?
11 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2014.
How do China and Mauritania rank globally for registering property (db05-15 methodology) - score?
China ranks 58th and Mauritania ranks 61st of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
183 places, 1,968 data points, 2004–2014
Last refreshed

The score for registering property is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the procedures, time, cost to transfer property between two local companies, as well as the quality of land administration index that evaluates the reliability of infrastructure, transparency of information, geographic coverage, land dispute resolution and equal access to property rights. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB05-15 studies.