China vs Paraguay: Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score

China
74.42
in 2014
Paraguay
74.81
in 2014
China rank
58th
Paraguay rank
55th

Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score over time

  • China
  • Paraguay
020406080200420092014

How they compare

Paraguay currently reports 74.81 against 74.42 in China, a difference of 0.39.

Across all 11 years both countries report, Paraguay has been ahead every year.

China ranks 58th and Paraguay ranks 55th of 181 countries.

Paraguay has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade China Paraguay Difference Ahead
2000s 72.14 74.65 2.51 Paraguay
2010s 73.24 74.8 1.56 Paraguay

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher registering property (db05-15 methodology) - score, China or Paraguay?
Paraguay, at 74.81 against 74.42 in China as of 2014.
What is the difference in registering property (db05-15 methodology) - score between China and Paraguay?
0.39, with Paraguay ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for China and Paraguay?
11 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2014.
How do China and Paraguay rank globally for registering property (db05-15 methodology) - score?
China ranks 58th and Paraguay ranks 55th of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
183 places, 1,968 data points, 2004–2014
Last refreshed

The score for registering property is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the procedures, time, cost to transfer property between two local companies, as well as the quality of land administration index that evaluates the reliability of infrastructure, transparency of information, geographic coverage, land dispute resolution and equal access to property rights. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB05-15 studies.