Colombia vs Peru: Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score

Colombia
76.77
in 2014
Peru
76.18
in 2014
Colombia rank
49th
Peru rank
51st

Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score over time

  • Colombia
  • Peru
020406080200420092014

How they compare

Colombia currently reports 76.77 against 76.18 in Peru, a difference of 0.59.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 11 shared years of data; in 2004 it was Peru ahead.

Colombia ranks 49th and Peru ranks 51st of 181 countries.

Peru has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Colombia Peru Difference Ahead
2000s 70.07 70.37 0.3006 Peru
2010s 75.42 76.22 0.7923 Peru

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher registering property (db05-15 methodology) - score, Colombia or Peru?
Colombia, at 76.77 against 76.18 in Peru as of 2014.
What is the difference in registering property (db05-15 methodology) - score between Colombia and Peru?
0.59, with Colombia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Colombia and Peru?
11 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2014.
How do Colombia and Peru rank globally for registering property (db05-15 methodology) - score?
Colombia ranks 49th and Peru ranks 51st of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
183 places, 1,968 data points, 2004–2014
Last refreshed

The score for registering property is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the procedures, time, cost to transfer property between two local companies, as well as the quality of land administration index that evaluates the reliability of infrastructure, transparency of information, geographic coverage, land dispute resolution and equal access to property rights. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB05-15 studies.