Comoros vs Jordan: Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score

Comoros
63.83
in 2014
Jordan
63.54
in 2014
Comoros rank
100th
Jordan rank
101st

Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score over time

  • Comoros
  • Jordan
0204060200420092014

How they compare

Comoros currently reports 63.83 against 63.54 in Jordan, a difference of 0.29.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 10 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Jordan ahead.

Comoros ranks 100th and Jordan ranks 101st of 181 countries.

Jordan has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Comoros Jordan Difference Ahead
2000s 53.71 59 5.29 Jordan
2010s 59.74 62.81 3.07 Jordan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher registering property (db05-15 methodology) - score, Comoros or Jordan?
Comoros, at 63.83 against 63.54 in Jordan as of 2014.
What is the difference in registering property (db05-15 methodology) - score between Comoros and Jordan?
0.29, with Comoros ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Comoros and Jordan?
10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
How do Comoros and Jordan rank globally for registering property (db05-15 methodology) - score?
Comoros ranks 100th and Jordan ranks 101st of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
183 places, 1,968 data points, 2004–2014
Last refreshed

The score for registering property is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the procedures, time, cost to transfer property between two local companies, as well as the quality of land administration index that evaluates the reliability of infrastructure, transparency of information, geographic coverage, land dispute resolution and equal access to property rights. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB05-15 studies.