Comoros vs Lao PDR: Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score

Comoros
63.83
in 2014
Lao PDR
63.85
in 2014
Comoros rank
100th
Lao PDR rank
99th

Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score over time

  • Comoros
  • Lao PDR
0204060200420092014

How they compare

Lao PDR currently reports 63.85 against 63.83 in Comoros, a difference of 0.02.

Across all 10 years both countries report, Lao PDR has been ahead every year.

Comoros ranks 100th and Lao PDR ranks 99th of 181 countries.

Lao PDR has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Comoros Lao PDR Difference Ahead
2000s 53.71 60.8 7.09 Lao PDR
2010s 59.74 65.55 5.81 Lao PDR

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher registering property (db05-15 methodology) - score, Comoros or Lao PDR?
Lao PDR, at 63.85 against 63.83 in Comoros as of 2014.
What is the difference in registering property (db05-15 methodology) - score between Comoros and Lao PDR?
0.02, with Lao PDR ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Comoros and Lao PDR?
10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
How do Comoros and Lao PDR rank globally for registering property (db05-15 methodology) - score?
Comoros ranks 100th and Lao PDR ranks 99th of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
183 places, 1,968 data points, 2004–2014
Last refreshed

The score for registering property is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the procedures, time, cost to transfer property between two local companies, as well as the quality of land administration index that evaluates the reliability of infrastructure, transparency of information, geographic coverage, land dispute resolution and equal access to property rights. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB05-15 studies.