Democratic Republic of Congo vs Equatorial Guinea: Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score
Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score over time
- Democratic Republic of Congo
- Equatorial Guinea
How they compare
Democratic Republic of Congo currently reports 55.39 against 54.82 in Equatorial Guinea, a difference of 0.57.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 10 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Equatorial Guinea ahead.
Democratic Republic of Congo ranks 141st and Equatorial Guinea ranks 142nd of 184 countries.
Equatorial Guinea has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Democratic Republic of Congo | Equatorial Guinea | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 42.57 | 54.82 | 12.25 | Equatorial Guinea |
| 2010s | 51.77 | 54.82 | 3.05 | Equatorial Guinea |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher registering property (db05-15 methodology) - score, Democratic Republic of Congo or Equatorial Guinea?
- Democratic Republic of Congo, at 55.39 against 54.82 in Equatorial Guinea as of 2014.
- What is the difference in registering property (db05-15 methodology) - score between Democratic Republic of Congo and Equatorial Guinea?
- 0.57, with Democratic Republic of Congo ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Democratic Republic of Congo and Equatorial Guinea?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
- How do Democratic Republic of Congo and Equatorial Guinea rank globally for registering property (db05-15 methodology) - score?
- Democratic Republic of Congo ranks 141st and Equatorial Guinea ranks 142nd of 184 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for registering property is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the procedures, time, cost to transfer property between two local companies, as well as the quality of land administration index that evaluates the reliability of infrastructure, transparency of information, geographic coverage, land dispute resolution and equal access to property rights. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB05-15 studies.