Democratic Republic of Congo vs Kiribati: Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score
Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score over time
- Democratic Republic of Congo
- Kiribati
How they compare
Kiribati currently reports 55.48 against 55.39 in Democratic Republic of Congo, a difference of 0.09.
Across all 11 years both countries report, Kiribati has been ahead every year.
Democratic Republic of Congo ranks 139th and Kiribati ranks 136th of 181 countries.
Kiribati has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Democratic Republic of Congo | Kiribati | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 42.48 | 55.46 | 12.99 | Kiribati |
| 2010s | 51.77 | 55.48 | 3.71 | Kiribati |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher registering property (db05-15 methodology) - score, Democratic Republic of Congo or Kiribati?
- Kiribati, at 55.48 against 55.39 in Democratic Republic of Congo as of 2014.
- What is the difference in registering property (db05-15 methodology) - score between Democratic Republic of Congo and Kiribati?
- 0.09, with Kiribati ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Democratic Republic of Congo and Kiribati?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2014.
- How do Democratic Republic of Congo and Kiribati rank globally for registering property (db05-15 methodology) - score?
- Democratic Republic of Congo ranks 139th and Kiribati ranks 136th of 181 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for registering property is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the procedures, time, cost to transfer property between two local companies, as well as the quality of land administration index that evaluates the reliability of infrastructure, transparency of information, geographic coverage, land dispute resolution and equal access to property rights. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB05-15 studies.