Congo, Dem. Rep. vs Uruguay: Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score

Congo, Dem. Rep.
55.39
in 2014
Uruguay
54.57
in 2014
Congo, Dem. Rep. rank
139th
Uruguay rank
141st

Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score over time

  • Congo, Dem. Rep.
  • Uruguay
0204060200420092014

How they compare

Congo, Dem. Rep. currently reports 55.39 against 54.57 in Uruguay, a difference of 0.82.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 11 shared years of data; in 2004 it was Uruguay ahead.

Congo, Dem. Rep. ranks 139th and Uruguay ranks 141st of 181 countries.

Uruguay has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Congo, Dem. Rep. Uruguay Difference Ahead
2000s 42.48 53.99 11.51 Uruguay
2010s 51.77 54.57 2.79 Uruguay

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher registering property (db05-15 methodology) - score, Congo, Dem. Rep. or Uruguay?
Congo, Dem. Rep., at 55.39 against 54.57 in Uruguay as of 2014.
What is the difference in registering property (db05-15 methodology) - score between Congo, Dem. Rep. and Uruguay?
0.82, with Congo, Dem. Rep. ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Congo, Dem. Rep. and Uruguay?
11 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2014.
How do Congo, Dem. Rep. and Uruguay rank globally for registering property (db05-15 methodology) - score?
Congo, Dem. Rep. ranks 139th and Uruguay ranks 141st of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
183 places, 1,968 data points, 2004–2014
Last refreshed

The score for registering property is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the procedures, time, cost to transfer property between two local companies, as well as the quality of land administration index that evaluates the reliability of infrastructure, transparency of information, geographic coverage, land dispute resolution and equal access to property rights. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB05-15 studies.