Congo, Rep. vs Madagascar: Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score

Congo, Rep.
47.1
in 2014
Madagascar
47.52
in 2014
Congo, Rep. rank
158th
Madagascar rank
157th

Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score over time

  • Congo, Rep.
  • Madagascar
0204060200420092014

How they compare

Madagascar currently reports 47.52 against 47.1 in Congo, Rep., a difference of 0.42.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 11 shared years of data; in 2004 it was Congo, Rep. ahead.

Congo, Rep. ranks 158th and Madagascar ranks 157th of 181 countries.

Congo, Rep. has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Congo, Rep. Madagascar Difference Ahead
2000s 48.76 42.38 6.38 Congo, Rep.
2010s 49.12 47.55 1.57 Congo, Rep.

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher registering property (db05-15 methodology) - score, Congo, Rep. or Madagascar?
Madagascar, at 47.52 against 47.1 in Congo, Rep. as of 2014.
What is the difference in registering property (db05-15 methodology) - score between Congo, Rep. and Madagascar?
0.42, with Madagascar ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Congo, Rep. and Madagascar?
11 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2014.
How do Congo, Rep. and Madagascar rank globally for registering property (db05-15 methodology) - score?
Congo, Rep. ranks 158th and Madagascar ranks 157th of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
183 places, 1,968 data points, 2004–2014
Last refreshed

The score for registering property is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the procedures, time, cost to transfer property between two local companies, as well as the quality of land administration index that evaluates the reliability of infrastructure, transparency of information, geographic coverage, land dispute resolution and equal access to property rights. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB05-15 studies.