Cote d'Ivoire vs Grenada: Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score

Cote d'Ivoire
60.05
in 2014
Grenada
59.12
in 2014
Cote d'Ivoire rank
116th
Grenada rank
118th

Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score over time

  • Cote d'Ivoire
  • Grenada
2030405060200420092014

How they compare

Cote d'Ivoire currently reports 60.05 against 59.12 in Grenada, a difference of 0.93.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 10 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Grenada ahead.

Cote d'Ivoire ranks 116th and Grenada ranks 118th of 181 countries.

Grenada has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Cote d'Ivoire Grenada Difference Ahead
2000s 41.51 51.89 10.38 Grenada
2010s 51.53 57.23 5.7 Grenada

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher registering property (db05-15 methodology) - score, Cote d'Ivoire or Grenada?
Cote d'Ivoire, at 60.05 against 59.12 in Grenada as of 2014.
What is the difference in registering property (db05-15 methodology) - score between Cote d'Ivoire and Grenada?
0.93, with Cote d'Ivoire ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cote d'Ivoire and Grenada?
10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
How do Cote d'Ivoire and Grenada rank globally for registering property (db05-15 methodology) - score?
Cote d'Ivoire ranks 116th and Grenada ranks 118th of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
183 places, 1,968 data points, 2004–2014
Last refreshed

The score for registering property is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the procedures, time, cost to transfer property between two local companies, as well as the quality of land administration index that evaluates the reliability of infrastructure, transparency of information, geographic coverage, land dispute resolution and equal access to property rights. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB05-15 studies.