Côte d'Ivoire vs Tanzania, United Republic of: Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score
Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score over time
- Côte d'Ivoire
- Tanzania, United Republic of
How they compare
Tanzania, United Republic of currently reports 60.1 against 60.05 in Côte d'Ivoire, a difference of 0.05.
Across all 11 years both countries report, Tanzania, United Republic of has been ahead every year.
Côte d'Ivoire ranks 118th and Tanzania, United Republic of ranks 117th of 184 countries.
Tanzania, United Republic of has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Côte d'Ivoire | Tanzania, United Republic of | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 37.75 | 55.12 | 17.37 | Tanzania, United Republic of |
| 2010s | 51.53 | 59.23 | 7.69 | Tanzania, United Republic of |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher registering property (db05-15 methodology) - score, Côte d'Ivoire or Tanzania, United Republic of?
- Tanzania, United Republic of, at 60.1 against 60.05 in Côte d'Ivoire as of 2014.
- What is the difference in registering property (db05-15 methodology) - score between Côte d'Ivoire and Tanzania, United Republic of?
- 0.05, with Tanzania, United Republic of ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Côte d'Ivoire and Tanzania, United Republic of?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2014.
- How do Côte d'Ivoire and Tanzania, United Republic of rank globally for registering property (db05-15 methodology) - score?
- Côte d'Ivoire ranks 118th and Tanzania, United Republic of ranks 117th of 184 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for registering property is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the procedures, time, cost to transfer property between two local companies, as well as the quality of land administration index that evaluates the reliability of infrastructure, transparency of information, geographic coverage, land dispute resolution and equal access to property rights. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB05-15 studies.