Croatia vs Iran: Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score

Croatia
66.28
in 2014
Iran
65.93
in 2014
Croatia rank
91st
Iran rank
94th

Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score over time

  • Croatia
  • Iran
0204060200420092014

How they compare

Croatia currently reports 66.28 against 65.93 in Iran, a difference of 0.35.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 11 shared years of data; in 2004 it was Iran ahead.

Croatia ranks 91st and Iran ranks 94th of 181 countries.

Iran has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Croatia Iran Difference Ahead
2000s 49.23 65.99 16.76 Iran
2010s 65.32 65.96 0.6378 Iran

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher registering property (db05-15 methodology) - score, Croatia or Iran?
Croatia, at 66.28 against 65.93 in Iran as of 2014.
What is the difference in registering property (db05-15 methodology) - score between Croatia and Iran?
0.35, with Croatia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Croatia and Iran?
11 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2014.
How do Croatia and Iran rank globally for registering property (db05-15 methodology) - score?
Croatia ranks 91st and Iran ranks 94th of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
183 places, 1,968 data points, 2004–2014
Last refreshed

The score for registering property is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the procedures, time, cost to transfer property between two local companies, as well as the quality of land administration index that evaluates the reliability of infrastructure, transparency of information, geographic coverage, land dispute resolution and equal access to property rights. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB05-15 studies.