Croatia vs Lesotho: Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score

Croatia
66.28
in 2014
Lesotho
66.62
in 2014
Croatia rank
91st
Lesotho rank
89th

Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score over time

  • Croatia
  • Lesotho
0204060200420092014

How they compare

Lesotho currently reports 66.62 against 66.28 in Croatia, a difference of 0.34.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 11 shared years of data; in 2004 it was Lesotho ahead.

Croatia ranks 91st and Lesotho ranks 89th of 181 countries.

Across the 2 decades both report, Croatia averaged higher in 1 and Lesotho in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Croatia Lesotho Difference Ahead
2000s 49.23 51.71 2.48 Lesotho
2010s 65.32 58.02 7.3 Croatia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher registering property (db05-15 methodology) - score, Croatia or Lesotho?
Lesotho, at 66.62 against 66.28 in Croatia as of 2014.
What is the difference in registering property (db05-15 methodology) - score between Croatia and Lesotho?
0.34, with Lesotho ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Croatia and Lesotho?
11 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2014.
How do Croatia and Lesotho rank globally for registering property (db05-15 methodology) - score?
Croatia ranks 91st and Lesotho ranks 89th of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
183 places, 1,968 data points, 2004–2014
Last refreshed

The score for registering property is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the procedures, time, cost to transfer property between two local companies, as well as the quality of land administration index that evaluates the reliability of infrastructure, transparency of information, geographic coverage, land dispute resolution and equal access to property rights. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB05-15 studies.