Cyprus vs Eswatini: Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score

Cyprus
58.89
in 2014
Eswatini
58.78
in 2014
Cyprus rank
120th
Eswatini rank
121st

Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score over time

  • Cyprus
  • Eswatini
0204060200520092014

How they compare

Cyprus currently reports 58.89 against 58.78 in Eswatini, a difference of 0.11.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 7 shared years of data; in 2008 it was Eswatini ahead.

Cyprus ranks 120th and Eswatini ranks 121st of 181 countries.

Eswatini has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Cyprus Eswatini Difference Ahead
2000s 53.69 55.24 1.56 Eswatini
2010s 56.08 58.12 2.04 Eswatini

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher registering property (db05-15 methodology) - score, Cyprus or Eswatini?
Cyprus, at 58.89 against 58.78 in Eswatini as of 2014.
What is the difference in registering property (db05-15 methodology) - score between Cyprus and Eswatini?
0.11, with Cyprus ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cyprus and Eswatini?
7 years are reported by both, from 2008 to 2014.
How do Cyprus and Eswatini rank globally for registering property (db05-15 methodology) - score?
Cyprus ranks 120th and Eswatini ranks 121st of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
183 places, 1,968 data points, 2004–2014
Last refreshed

The score for registering property is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the procedures, time, cost to transfer property between two local companies, as well as the quality of land administration index that evaluates the reliability of infrastructure, transparency of information, geographic coverage, land dispute resolution and equal access to property rights. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB05-15 studies.