Cyprus vs Grenada: Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score

Cyprus
58.89
in 2014
Grenada
59.12
in 2014
Cyprus rank
120th
Grenada rank
118th

Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score over time

  • Cyprus
  • Grenada
0204060200520092014

How they compare

Grenada currently reports 59.12 against 58.89 in Cyprus, a difference of 0.23.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 7 shared years of data; in 2008 it was Cyprus ahead.

Cyprus ranks 120th and Grenada ranks 118th of 181 countries.

Across the 2 decades both report, Cyprus averaged higher in 1 and Grenada in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Cyprus Grenada Difference Ahead
2000s 53.69 52.02 1.66 Cyprus
2010s 56.08 57.23 1.15 Grenada

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher registering property (db05-15 methodology) - score, Cyprus or Grenada?
Grenada, at 59.12 against 58.89 in Cyprus as of 2014.
What is the difference in registering property (db05-15 methodology) - score between Cyprus and Grenada?
0.23, with Grenada ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cyprus and Grenada?
7 years are reported by both, from 2008 to 2014.
How do Cyprus and Grenada rank globally for registering property (db05-15 methodology) - score?
Cyprus ranks 120th and Grenada ranks 118th of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
183 places, 1,968 data points, 2004–2014
Last refreshed

The score for registering property is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the procedures, time, cost to transfer property between two local companies, as well as the quality of land administration index that evaluates the reliability of infrastructure, transparency of information, geographic coverage, land dispute resolution and equal access to property rights. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB05-15 studies.