Cyprus vs Mali: Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score

Cyprus
58.89
in 2014
Mali
58.94
in 2014
Cyprus rank
120th
Mali rank
119th

Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score over time

  • Cyprus
  • Mali
0204060200420092014

How they compare

Mali currently reports 58.94 against 58.89 in Cyprus, a difference of 0.05.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 7 shared years of data; in 2008 it was Cyprus ahead.

Cyprus ranks 120th and Mali ranks 119th of 181 countries.

Across the 2 decades both report, Cyprus averaged higher in 1 and Mali in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Cyprus Mali Difference Ahead
2000s 53.69 51.09 2.6 Cyprus
2010s 56.08 58.94 2.85 Mali

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher registering property (db05-15 methodology) - score, Cyprus or Mali?
Mali, at 58.94 against 58.89 in Cyprus as of 2014.
What is the difference in registering property (db05-15 methodology) - score between Cyprus and Mali?
0.05, with Mali ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cyprus and Mali?
7 years are reported by both, from 2008 to 2014.
How do Cyprus and Mali rank globally for registering property (db05-15 methodology) - score?
Cyprus ranks 120th and Mali ranks 119th of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
183 places, 1,968 data points, 2004–2014
Last refreshed

The score for registering property is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the procedures, time, cost to transfer property between two local companies, as well as the quality of land administration index that evaluates the reliability of infrastructure, transparency of information, geographic coverage, land dispute resolution and equal access to property rights. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB05-15 studies.