Denmark vs Estonia: Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score

Denmark
92.61
in 2014
Estonia
90.88
in 2014
Denmark rank
8th
Estonia rank
11th

Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score over time

  • Denmark
  • Estonia
020406080100200420092014

How they compare

Denmark currently reports 92.61 against 90.88 in Estonia, a difference of 1.73.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 11 shared years of data; in 2004 it was Estonia ahead.

Denmark ranks 8th and Estonia ranks 11th of 181 countries.

Across the 2 decades both report, Denmark averaged higher in 1 and Estonia in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Denmark Estonia Difference Ahead
2000s 78.2 86.15 7.95 Estonia
2010s 90.92 90.73 0.1829 Denmark

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher registering property (db05-15 methodology) - score, Denmark or Estonia?
Denmark, at 92.61 against 90.88 in Estonia as of 2014.
What is the difference in registering property (db05-15 methodology) - score between Denmark and Estonia?
1.73, with Denmark ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Denmark and Estonia?
11 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2014.
How do Denmark and Estonia rank globally for registering property (db05-15 methodology) - score?
Denmark ranks 8th and Estonia ranks 11th of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
183 places, 1,968 data points, 2004–2014
Last refreshed

The score for registering property is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the procedures, time, cost to transfer property between two local companies, as well as the quality of land administration index that evaluates the reliability of infrastructure, transparency of information, geographic coverage, land dispute resolution and equal access to property rights. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB05-15 studies.