Dominica vs Uruguay: Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score

Dominica
52.86
in 2014
Uruguay
54.57
in 2014
Dominica rank
144th
Uruguay rank
141st

Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score over time

  • Dominica
  • Uruguay
0204060200420092014

How they compare

Uruguay currently reports 54.57 against 52.86 in Dominica, a difference of 1.71.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 10 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Uruguay ahead.

Dominica ranks 144th and Uruguay ranks 141st of 181 countries.

Uruguay has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Dominica Uruguay Difference Ahead
2000s 51.84 53.92 2.08 Uruguay
2010s 52.69 54.57 1.87 Uruguay

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher registering property (db05-15 methodology) - score, Dominica or Uruguay?
Uruguay, at 54.57 against 52.86 in Dominica as of 2014.
What is the difference in registering property (db05-15 methodology) - score between Dominica and Uruguay?
1.71, with Uruguay ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Dominica and Uruguay?
10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
How do Dominica and Uruguay rank globally for registering property (db05-15 methodology) - score?
Dominica ranks 144th and Uruguay ranks 141st of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
183 places, 1,968 data points, 2004–2014
Last refreshed

The score for registering property is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the procedures, time, cost to transfer property between two local companies, as well as the quality of land administration index that evaluates the reliability of infrastructure, transparency of information, geographic coverage, land dispute resolution and equal access to property rights. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB05-15 studies.