Dominican Republic vs South Korea: Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score
Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score over time
- Dominican Republic
- South Korea
How they compare
South Korea currently reports 70.99 against 70.76 in Dominican Republic, a difference of 0.23.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 11 shared years of data; in 2004 it was South Korea ahead.
Dominican Republic ranks 77th and South Korea ranks 75th of 184 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Dominican Republic averaged higher in 1 and South Korea in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Dominican Republic | South Korea | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 64.54 | 70.22 | 5.67 | South Korea |
| 2010s | 70.74 | 70.72 | 0.0149 | Dominican Republic |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher registering property (db05-15 methodology) - score, Dominican Republic or South Korea?
- South Korea, at 70.99 against 70.76 in Dominican Republic as of 2014.
- What is the difference in registering property (db05-15 methodology) - score between Dominican Republic and South Korea?
- 0.23, with South Korea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Dominican Republic and South Korea?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2014.
- How do Dominican Republic and South Korea rank globally for registering property (db05-15 methodology) - score?
- Dominican Republic ranks 77th and South Korea ranks 75th of 184 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for registering property is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the procedures, time, cost to transfer property between two local companies, as well as the quality of land administration index that evaluates the reliability of infrastructure, transparency of information, geographic coverage, land dispute resolution and equal access to property rights. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB05-15 studies.