Ecuador vs United Kingdom: Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score

Ecuador
73.69
in 2014
United Kingdom
72.55
in 2014
Ecuador rank
60th
United Kingdom rank
63rd

Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score over time

  • Ecuador
  • United Kingdom
020406080200420092014

How they compare

Ecuador currently reports 73.69 against 72.55 in United Kingdom, a difference of 1.14.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 11 shared years of data; in 2004 it was United Kingdom ahead.

Ecuador ranks 60th and United Kingdom ranks 63rd of 181 countries.

Ecuador has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Ecuador United Kingdom Difference Ahead
2000s 72.51 69.36 3.16 Ecuador
2010s 74.79 71.76 3.02 Ecuador

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher registering property (db05-15 methodology) - score, Ecuador or United Kingdom?
Ecuador, at 73.69 against 72.55 in United Kingdom as of 2014.
What is the difference in registering property (db05-15 methodology) - score between Ecuador and United Kingdom?
1.14, with Ecuador ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and United Kingdom?
11 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2014.
How do Ecuador and United Kingdom rank globally for registering property (db05-15 methodology) - score?
Ecuador ranks 60th and United Kingdom ranks 63rd of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
183 places, 1,968 data points, 2004–2014
Last refreshed

The score for registering property is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the procedures, time, cost to transfer property between two local companies, as well as the quality of land administration index that evaluates the reliability of infrastructure, transparency of information, geographic coverage, land dispute resolution and equal access to property rights. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB05-15 studies.