Egypt vs Jordan: Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score

Egypt
64.32
in 2014
Jordan
63.54
in 2014
Egypt rank
98th
Jordan rank
101st

Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score over time

  • Egypt
  • Jordan
0204060200420092014

How they compare

Egypt currently reports 64.32 against 63.54 in Jordan, a difference of 0.78.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 11 shared years of data; in 2004 it was Jordan ahead.

Egypt ranks 98th and Jordan ranks 101st of 181 countries.

Across the 2 decades both report, Egypt averaged higher in 1 and Jordan in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Egypt Jordan Difference Ahead
2000s 44.84 58.81 13.97 Jordan
2010s 62.81 62.81 0.0015 Egypt

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher registering property (db05-15 methodology) - score, Egypt or Jordan?
Egypt, at 64.32 against 63.54 in Jordan as of 2014.
What is the difference in registering property (db05-15 methodology) - score between Egypt and Jordan?
0.78, with Egypt ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Egypt and Jordan?
11 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2014.
How do Egypt and Jordan rank globally for registering property (db05-15 methodology) - score?
Egypt ranks 98th and Jordan ranks 101st of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
183 places, 1,968 data points, 2004–2014
Last refreshed

The score for registering property is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the procedures, time, cost to transfer property between two local companies, as well as the quality of land administration index that evaluates the reliability of infrastructure, transparency of information, geographic coverage, land dispute resolution and equal access to property rights. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB05-15 studies.