Egypt vs Kuwait: Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score

Egypt
64.32
in 2014
Kuwait
65.61
in 2014
Egypt rank
98th
Kuwait rank
96th

Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score over time

  • Egypt
  • Kuwait
0204060200420092014

How they compare

Kuwait currently reports 65.61 against 64.32 in Egypt, a difference of 1.29.

Across all 11 years both countries report, Kuwait has been ahead every year.

Egypt ranks 98th and Kuwait ranks 96th of 181 countries.

Kuwait has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Egypt Kuwait Difference Ahead
2000s 44.84 66.48 21.64 Kuwait
2010s 62.81 67.94 5.14 Kuwait

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher registering property (db05-15 methodology) - score, Egypt or Kuwait?
Kuwait, at 65.61 against 64.32 in Egypt as of 2014.
What is the difference in registering property (db05-15 methodology) - score between Egypt and Kuwait?
1.29, with Kuwait ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Egypt and Kuwait?
11 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2014.
How do Egypt and Kuwait rank globally for registering property (db05-15 methodology) - score?
Egypt ranks 98th and Kuwait ranks 96th of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
183 places, 1,968 data points, 2004–2014
Last refreshed

The score for registering property is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the procedures, time, cost to transfer property between two local companies, as well as the quality of land administration index that evaluates the reliability of infrastructure, transparency of information, geographic coverage, land dispute resolution and equal access to property rights. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB05-15 studies.