Equatorial Guinea vs India: Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score

Equatorial Guinea
54.82
in 2014
India
54.12
in 2014
Equatorial Guinea rank
140th
India rank
142nd

Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score over time

  • Equatorial Guinea
  • India
0204060200420092014

How they compare

Equatorial Guinea currently reports 54.82 against 54.12 in India, a difference of 0.7.

Across all 10 years both countries report, Equatorial Guinea has been ahead every year.

Equatorial Guinea ranks 140th and India ranks 142nd of 181 countries.

Equatorial Guinea has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Equatorial Guinea India Difference Ahead
2000s 54.82 50.62 4.2 Equatorial Guinea
2010s 54.82 53.23 1.6 Equatorial Guinea

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher registering property (db05-15 methodology) - score, Equatorial Guinea or India?
Equatorial Guinea, at 54.82 against 54.12 in India as of 2014.
What is the difference in registering property (db05-15 methodology) - score between Equatorial Guinea and India?
0.7, with Equatorial Guinea ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Equatorial Guinea and India?
10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
How do Equatorial Guinea and India rank globally for registering property (db05-15 methodology) - score?
Equatorial Guinea ranks 140th and India ranks 142nd of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
183 places, 1,968 data points, 2004–2014
Last refreshed

The score for registering property is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the procedures, time, cost to transfer property between two local companies, as well as the quality of land administration index that evaluates the reliability of infrastructure, transparency of information, geographic coverage, land dispute resolution and equal access to property rights. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB05-15 studies.