Equatorial Guinea vs Syria: Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score
Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score over time
- Equatorial Guinea
- Syria
How they compare
Syria currently reports 55.46 against 54.82 in Equatorial Guinea, a difference of 0.64.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 10 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Equatorial Guinea ahead.
Equatorial Guinea ranks 141st and Syria ranks 138th of 183 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Equatorial Guinea averaged higher in 1 and Syria in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Equatorial Guinea | Syria | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 54.82 | 54.7 | 0.1242 | Equatorial Guinea |
| 2010s | 54.82 | 55.46 | 0.6413 | Syria |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher registering property (db05-15 methodology) - score, Equatorial Guinea or Syria?
- Syria, at 55.46 against 54.82 in Equatorial Guinea as of 2014.
- What is the difference in registering property (db05-15 methodology) - score between Equatorial Guinea and Syria?
- 0.64, with Syria ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Equatorial Guinea and Syria?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
- How do Equatorial Guinea and Syria rank globally for registering property (db05-15 methodology) - score?
- Equatorial Guinea ranks 141st and Syria ranks 138th of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for registering property is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the procedures, time, cost to transfer property between two local companies, as well as the quality of land administration index that evaluates the reliability of infrastructure, transparency of information, geographic coverage, land dispute resolution and equal access to property rights. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB05-15 studies.