Eritrea vs Gabon: Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score

Eritrea
39.78
in 2014
Gabon
39.45
in 2014
Eritrea rank
170th
Gabon rank
171st

Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score over time

  • Eritrea
  • Gabon
0204060200420092014

How they compare

Eritrea currently reports 39.78 against 39.45 in Gabon, a difference of 0.33.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 10 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Gabon ahead.

Eritrea ranks 170th and Gabon ranks 171st of 181 countries.

Gabon has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Eritrea Gabon Difference Ahead
2000s 39.56 54.9 15.34 Gabon
2010s 39.75 51.59 11.85 Gabon

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher registering property (db05-15 methodology) - score, Eritrea or Gabon?
Eritrea, at 39.78 against 39.45 in Gabon as of 2014.
What is the difference in registering property (db05-15 methodology) - score between Eritrea and Gabon?
0.33, with Eritrea ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Eritrea and Gabon?
10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
How do Eritrea and Gabon rank globally for registering property (db05-15 methodology) - score?
Eritrea ranks 170th and Gabon ranks 171st of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
183 places, 1,968 data points, 2004–2014
Last refreshed

The score for registering property is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the procedures, time, cost to transfer property between two local companies, as well as the quality of land administration index that evaluates the reliability of infrastructure, transparency of information, geographic coverage, land dispute resolution and equal access to property rights. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB05-15 studies.