Eritrea vs Namibia: Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score

Eritrea
39.78
in 2014
Namibia
41.61
in 2014
Eritrea rank
170th
Namibia rank
168th

Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score over time

  • Eritrea
  • Namibia
0204060200420092014

How they compare

Namibia currently reports 41.61 against 39.78 in Eritrea, a difference of 1.83.

Across all 11 years both countries report, Namibia has been ahead every year.

Eritrea ranks 170th and Namibia ranks 168th of 181 countries.

Namibia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Eritrea Namibia Difference Ahead
2000s 39.53 56.22 16.7 Namibia
2010s 39.75 47 7.26 Namibia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher registering property (db05-15 methodology) - score, Eritrea or Namibia?
Namibia, at 41.61 against 39.78 in Eritrea as of 2014.
What is the difference in registering property (db05-15 methodology) - score between Eritrea and Namibia?
1.83, with Namibia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Eritrea and Namibia?
11 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2014.
How do Eritrea and Namibia rank globally for registering property (db05-15 methodology) - score?
Eritrea ranks 170th and Namibia ranks 168th of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
183 places, 1,968 data points, 2004–2014
Last refreshed

The score for registering property is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the procedures, time, cost to transfer property between two local companies, as well as the quality of land administration index that evaluates the reliability of infrastructure, transparency of information, geographic coverage, land dispute resolution and equal access to property rights. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB05-15 studies.