Eswatini vs Sri Lanka: Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score

Eswatini
58.78
in 2014
Sri Lanka
58.45
in 2014
Eswatini rank
121st
Sri Lanka rank
123rd

Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score over time

  • Eswatini
  • Sri Lanka
0204060200420092014

How they compare

Eswatini currently reports 58.78 against 58.45 in Sri Lanka, a difference of 0.33.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 10 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Sri Lanka ahead.

Eswatini ranks 121st and Sri Lanka ranks 123rd of 181 countries.

Sri Lanka has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Eswatini Sri Lanka Difference Ahead
2000s 55.19 57.97 2.78 Sri Lanka
2010s 58.12 58.86 0.7347 Sri Lanka

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher registering property (db05-15 methodology) - score, Eswatini or Sri Lanka?
Eswatini, at 58.78 against 58.45 in Sri Lanka as of 2014.
What is the difference in registering property (db05-15 methodology) - score between Eswatini and Sri Lanka?
0.33, with Eswatini ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Eswatini and Sri Lanka?
10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
How do Eswatini and Sri Lanka rank globally for registering property (db05-15 methodology) - score?
Eswatini ranks 121st and Sri Lanka ranks 123rd of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
183 places, 1,968 data points, 2004–2014
Last refreshed

The score for registering property is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the procedures, time, cost to transfer property between two local companies, as well as the quality of land administration index that evaluates the reliability of infrastructure, transparency of information, geographic coverage, land dispute resolution and equal access to property rights. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB05-15 studies.