Eswatini vs Saint Lucia: Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score
Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score over time
- Eswatini
- Saint Lucia
How they compare
Eswatini currently reports 58.78 against 58.38 in Saint Lucia, a difference of 0.4.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 10 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Saint Lucia ahead.
Eswatini ranks 121st and Saint Lucia ranks 124th of 181 countries.
Saint Lucia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Eswatini | Saint Lucia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 55.19 | 58.8 | 3.6 | Saint Lucia |
| 2010s | 58.12 | 58.58 | 0.4509 | Saint Lucia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher registering property (db05-15 methodology) - score, Eswatini or Saint Lucia?
- Eswatini, at 58.78 against 58.38 in Saint Lucia as of 2014.
- What is the difference in registering property (db05-15 methodology) - score between Eswatini and Saint Lucia?
- 0.4, with Eswatini ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Eswatini and Saint Lucia?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
- How do Eswatini and Saint Lucia rank globally for registering property (db05-15 methodology) - score?
- Eswatini ranks 121st and Saint Lucia ranks 124th of 181 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for registering property is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the procedures, time, cost to transfer property between two local companies, as well as the quality of land administration index that evaluates the reliability of infrastructure, transparency of information, geographic coverage, land dispute resolution and equal access to property rights. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB05-15 studies.