Ethiopia vs Guyana: Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score

Ethiopia
61.69
in 2014
Guyana
61.14
in 2014
Ethiopia rank
108th
Guyana rank
110th

Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score over time

  • Ethiopia
  • Guyana
0204060200420092014

How they compare

Ethiopia currently reports 61.69 against 61.14 in Guyana, a difference of 0.55.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 11 shared years of data; in 2004 it was Guyana ahead.

Ethiopia ranks 108th and Guyana ranks 110th of 181 countries.

Guyana has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Ethiopia Guyana Difference Ahead
2000s 53.42 67.75 14.32 Guyana
2010s 61.59 62.49 0.8971 Guyana

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher registering property (db05-15 methodology) - score, Ethiopia or Guyana?
Ethiopia, at 61.69 against 61.14 in Guyana as of 2014.
What is the difference in registering property (db05-15 methodology) - score between Ethiopia and Guyana?
0.55, with Ethiopia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Ethiopia and Guyana?
11 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2014.
How do Ethiopia and Guyana rank globally for registering property (db05-15 methodology) - score?
Ethiopia ranks 108th and Guyana ranks 110th of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
183 places, 1,968 data points, 2004–2014
Last refreshed

The score for registering property is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the procedures, time, cost to transfer property between two local companies, as well as the quality of land administration index that evaluates the reliability of infrastructure, transparency of information, geographic coverage, land dispute resolution and equal access to property rights. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB05-15 studies.