Ethiopia vs Philippines: Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score

Ethiopia
61.69
in 2014
Philippines
62.81
in 2014
Ethiopia rank
108th
Philippines rank
105th

Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score over time

  • Ethiopia
  • Philippines
0204060200420092014

How they compare

Philippines currently reports 62.81 against 61.69 in Ethiopia, a difference of 1.12.

Across all 11 years both countries report, Philippines has been ahead every year.

Ethiopia ranks 108th and Philippines ranks 105th of 181 countries.

Philippines has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Ethiopia Philippines Difference Ahead
2000s 53.42 62.82 9.4 Philippines
2010s 61.59 62.74 1.15 Philippines

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher registering property (db05-15 methodology) - score, Ethiopia or Philippines?
Philippines, at 62.81 against 61.69 in Ethiopia as of 2014.
What is the difference in registering property (db05-15 methodology) - score between Ethiopia and Philippines?
1.12, with Philippines ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Ethiopia and Philippines?
11 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2014.
How do Ethiopia and Philippines rank globally for registering property (db05-15 methodology) - score?
Ethiopia ranks 108th and Philippines ranks 105th of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
183 places, 1,968 data points, 2004–2014
Last refreshed

The score for registering property is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the procedures, time, cost to transfer property between two local companies, as well as the quality of land administration index that evaluates the reliability of infrastructure, transparency of information, geographic coverage, land dispute resolution and equal access to property rights. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB05-15 studies.