Finland vs Peru: Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score

Finland
75.8
in 2014
Peru
76.18
in 2014
Finland rank
52nd
Peru rank
51st

Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score over time

  • Finland
  • Peru
020406080200420092014

How they compare

Peru currently reports 76.18 against 75.8 in Finland, a difference of 0.38.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 11 shared years of data; in 2004 it was Finland ahead.

Finland ranks 52nd and Peru ranks 51st of 181 countries.

Finland has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Finland Peru Difference Ahead
2000s 83.46 70.37 13.09 Finland
2010s 81.93 76.22 5.71 Finland

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher registering property (db05-15 methodology) - score, Finland or Peru?
Peru, at 76.18 against 75.8 in Finland as of 2014.
What is the difference in registering property (db05-15 methodology) - score between Finland and Peru?
0.38, with Peru ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Finland and Peru?
11 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2014.
How do Finland and Peru rank globally for registering property (db05-15 methodology) - score?
Finland ranks 52nd and Peru ranks 51st of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
183 places, 1,968 data points, 2004–2014
Last refreshed

The score for registering property is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the procedures, time, cost to transfer property between two local companies, as well as the quality of land administration index that evaluates the reliability of infrastructure, transparency of information, geographic coverage, land dispute resolution and equal access to property rights. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB05-15 studies.