France vs Guinea-Bissau: Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score

France
56.97
in 2014
Guinea-Bissau
57.55
in 2014
France rank
131st
Guinea-Bissau rank
129th

Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score over time

  • France
  • Guinea-Bissau
0204060200420092014

How they compare

Guinea-Bissau currently reports 57.55 against 56.97 in France, a difference of 0.58.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 10 shared years of data; in 2005 it was France ahead.

France ranks 131st and Guinea-Bissau ranks 129th of 181 countries.

France has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade France Guinea-Bissau Difference Ahead
2000s 41.98 30.41 11.57 France
2010s 55.7 42.4 13.3 France

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher registering property (db05-15 methodology) - score, France or Guinea-Bissau?
Guinea-Bissau, at 57.55 against 56.97 in France as of 2014.
What is the difference in registering property (db05-15 methodology) - score between France and Guinea-Bissau?
0.58, with Guinea-Bissau ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for France and Guinea-Bissau?
10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
How do France and Guinea-Bissau rank globally for registering property (db05-15 methodology) - score?
France ranks 131st and Guinea-Bissau ranks 129th of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
183 places, 1,968 data points, 2004–2014
Last refreshed

The score for registering property is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the procedures, time, cost to transfer property between two local companies, as well as the quality of land administration index that evaluates the reliability of infrastructure, transparency of information, geographic coverage, land dispute resolution and equal access to property rights. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB05-15 studies.