Georgia vs Kosovo: Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score

Georgia
99.87
in 2014
Kosovo
80.53
in 2014
Georgia rank
1st
Kosovo rank
1st

Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score over time

  • Georgia
  • Kosovo
020406080100200420092014

How they compare

Georgia currently reports 99.87 against 80.53 in Kosovo, a difference of 19.34.

That makes Georgia's figure about 1.2 times Kosovo's.

Across all 6 years both countries report, Georgia has been ahead every year.

Georgia ranks 1st and Kosovo ranks 1st of 181 countries.

Georgia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Georgia Kosovo Difference Ahead
2000s 96.86 80.19 16.67 Georgia
2010s 99.88 78.01 21.87 Georgia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher registering property (db05-15 methodology) - score, Georgia or Kosovo?
Georgia, at 99.87 against 80.53 in Kosovo as of 2014.
What is the difference in registering property (db05-15 methodology) - score between Georgia and Kosovo?
19.34, with Georgia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Georgia and Kosovo?
6 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2014.
How do Georgia and Kosovo rank globally for registering property (db05-15 methodology) - score?
Georgia ranks 1st and Kosovo ranks 1st of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
183 places, 1,968 data points, 2004–2014
Last refreshed

The score for registering property is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the procedures, time, cost to transfer property between two local companies, as well as the quality of land administration index that evaluates the reliability of infrastructure, transparency of information, geographic coverage, land dispute resolution and equal access to property rights. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB05-15 studies.