Germany vs Iraq: Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score

Germany
63.08
in 2014
Iraq
62.62
in 2014
Germany rank
104th
Iraq rank
107th

Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score over time

  • Germany
  • Iraq
0204060200420092014

How they compare

Germany currently reports 63.08 against 62.62 in Iraq, a difference of 0.46.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 11 shared years of data; in 2004 it was Germany ahead.

Germany ranks 104th and Iraq ranks 107th of 181 countries.

Germany has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Germany Iraq Difference Ahead
2000s 67.58 65.18 2.4 Germany
2010s 65.38 64.37 1.01 Germany

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher registering property (db05-15 methodology) - score, Germany or Iraq?
Germany, at 63.08 against 62.62 in Iraq as of 2014.
What is the difference in registering property (db05-15 methodology) - score between Germany and Iraq?
0.46, with Germany ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Germany and Iraq?
11 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2014.
How do Germany and Iraq rank globally for registering property (db05-15 methodology) - score?
Germany ranks 104th and Iraq ranks 107th of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
183 places, 1,968 data points, 2004–2014
Last refreshed

The score for registering property is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the procedures, time, cost to transfer property between two local companies, as well as the quality of land administration index that evaluates the reliability of infrastructure, transparency of information, geographic coverage, land dispute resolution and equal access to property rights. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB05-15 studies.