Germany vs Uganda: Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score

Germany
63.08
in 2014
Uganda
62.73
in 2014
Germany rank
104th
Uganda rank
106th

Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score over time

  • Germany
  • Uganda
0204060200420092014

How they compare

Germany currently reports 63.08 against 62.73 in Uganda, a difference of 0.35.

Across all 11 years both countries report, Germany has been ahead every year.

Germany ranks 104th and Uganda ranks 106th of 181 countries.

Germany has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Germany Uganda Difference Ahead
2000s 67.58 55.8 11.78 Germany
2010s 65.38 59.9 5.48 Germany

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher registering property (db05-15 methodology) - score, Germany or Uganda?
Germany, at 63.08 against 62.73 in Uganda as of 2014.
What is the difference in registering property (db05-15 methodology) - score between Germany and Uganda?
0.35, with Germany ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Germany and Uganda?
11 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2014.
How do Germany and Uganda rank globally for registering property (db05-15 methodology) - score?
Germany ranks 104th and Uganda ranks 106th of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
183 places, 1,968 data points, 2004–2014
Last refreshed

The score for registering property is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the procedures, time, cost to transfer property between two local companies, as well as the quality of land administration index that evaluates the reliability of infrastructure, transparency of information, geographic coverage, land dispute resolution and equal access to property rights. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB05-15 studies.