Greece vs Guinea: Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score

Greece
60.18
in 2014
Guinea
60.14
in 2014
Greece rank
113th
Guinea rank
114th

Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score over time

  • Greece
  • Guinea
0204060200420092014

How they compare

Greece currently reports 60.18 against 60.14 in Guinea, a difference of 0.04.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 11 shared years of data; in 2004 it was Guinea ahead.

Greece ranks 113th and Guinea ranks 114th of 181 countries.

Across the 2 decades both report, Greece averaged higher in 1 and Guinea in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Greece Guinea Difference Ahead
2000s 56.04 44.84 11.2 Greece
2010s 45.5 50.55 5.05 Guinea

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher registering property (db05-15 methodology) - score, Greece or Guinea?
Greece, at 60.18 against 60.14 in Guinea as of 2014.
What is the difference in registering property (db05-15 methodology) - score between Greece and Guinea?
0.04, with Greece ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Greece and Guinea?
11 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2014.
How do Greece and Guinea rank globally for registering property (db05-15 methodology) - score?
Greece ranks 113th and Guinea ranks 114th of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
183 places, 1,968 data points, 2004–2014
Last refreshed

The score for registering property is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the procedures, time, cost to transfer property between two local companies, as well as the quality of land administration index that evaluates the reliability of infrastructure, transparency of information, geographic coverage, land dispute resolution and equal access to property rights. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB05-15 studies.