Guatemala vs Japan: Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score

Guatemala
71.3
in 2014
Japan
72.46
in 2014
Guatemala rank
67th
Japan rank
64th

Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score over time

  • Guatemala
  • Japan
020406080200420092014

How they compare

Japan currently reports 72.46 against 71.3 in Guatemala, a difference of 1.16.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 11 shared years of data; in 2004 it was Japan ahead.

Guatemala ranks 67th and Japan ranks 64th of 181 countries.

Guatemala has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Guatemala Japan Difference Ahead
2000s 73.01 66.35 6.66 Guatemala
2010s 73.75 72.59 1.16 Guatemala

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher registering property (db05-15 methodology) - score, Guatemala or Japan?
Japan, at 72.46 against 71.3 in Guatemala as of 2014.
What is the difference in registering property (db05-15 methodology) - score between Guatemala and Japan?
1.16, with Japan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Guatemala and Japan?
11 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2014.
How do Guatemala and Japan rank globally for registering property (db05-15 methodology) - score?
Guatemala ranks 67th and Japan ranks 64th of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
183 places, 1,968 data points, 2004–2014
Last refreshed

The score for registering property is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the procedures, time, cost to transfer property between two local companies, as well as the quality of land administration index that evaluates the reliability of infrastructure, transparency of information, geographic coverage, land dispute resolution and equal access to property rights. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB05-15 studies.