Guinea vs Indonesia: Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score

Guinea
60.14
in 2014
Indonesia
60.7
in 2014
Guinea rank
114th
Indonesia rank
111th

Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score over time

  • Guinea
  • Indonesia
0204060200420092014

How they compare

Indonesia currently reports 60.7 against 60.14 in Guinea, a difference of 0.56.

Across all 11 years both countries report, Indonesia has been ahead every year.

Guinea ranks 114th and Indonesia ranks 111th of 181 countries.

Indonesia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Guinea Indonesia Difference Ahead
2000s 44.84 59.69 14.85 Indonesia
2010s 50.55 60.88 10.33 Indonesia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher registering property (db05-15 methodology) - score, Guinea or Indonesia?
Indonesia, at 60.7 against 60.14 in Guinea as of 2014.
What is the difference in registering property (db05-15 methodology) - score between Guinea and Indonesia?
0.56, with Indonesia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Guinea and Indonesia?
11 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2014.
How do Guinea and Indonesia rank globally for registering property (db05-15 methodology) - score?
Guinea ranks 114th and Indonesia ranks 111th of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
183 places, 1,968 data points, 2004–2014
Last refreshed

The score for registering property is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the procedures, time, cost to transfer property between two local companies, as well as the quality of land administration index that evaluates the reliability of infrastructure, transparency of information, geographic coverage, land dispute resolution and equal access to property rights. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB05-15 studies.