Guinea vs Tanzania: Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score

Guinea
60.14
in 2014
Tanzania
60.1
in 2014
Guinea rank
114th
Tanzania rank
115th

Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score over time

  • Guinea
  • Tanzania
0204060200420092014

How they compare

Guinea currently reports 60.14 against 60.1 in Tanzania, a difference of 0.04.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 11 shared years of data; in 2004 it was Tanzania ahead.

Guinea ranks 114th and Tanzania ranks 115th of 181 countries.

Tanzania has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Guinea Tanzania Difference Ahead
2000s 44.84 55.12 10.29 Tanzania
2010s 50.55 59.23 8.67 Tanzania

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher registering property (db05-15 methodology) - score, Guinea or Tanzania?
Guinea, at 60.14 against 60.1 in Tanzania as of 2014.
What is the difference in registering property (db05-15 methodology) - score between Guinea and Tanzania?
0.04, with Guinea ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Guinea and Tanzania?
11 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2014.
How do Guinea and Tanzania rank globally for registering property (db05-15 methodology) - score?
Guinea ranks 114th and Tanzania ranks 115th of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
183 places, 1,968 data points, 2004–2014
Last refreshed

The score for registering property is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the procedures, time, cost to transfer property between two local companies, as well as the quality of land administration index that evaluates the reliability of infrastructure, transparency of information, geographic coverage, land dispute resolution and equal access to property rights. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB05-15 studies.