Guyana vs Indonesia: Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score

Guyana
61.14
in 2014
Indonesia
60.7
in 2014
Guyana rank
110th
Indonesia rank
111th

Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score over time

  • Guyana
  • Indonesia
0204060200420092014

How they compare

Guyana currently reports 61.14 against 60.7 in Indonesia, a difference of 0.44.

Across all 11 years both countries report, Guyana has been ahead every year.

Guyana ranks 110th and Indonesia ranks 111th of 181 countries.

Guyana has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Guyana Indonesia Difference Ahead
2000s 67.75 59.69 8.06 Guyana
2010s 62.49 60.88 1.61 Guyana

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher registering property (db05-15 methodology) - score, Guyana or Indonesia?
Guyana, at 61.14 against 60.7 in Indonesia as of 2014.
What is the difference in registering property (db05-15 methodology) - score between Guyana and Indonesia?
0.44, with Guyana ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Guyana and Indonesia?
11 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2014.
How do Guyana and Indonesia rank globally for registering property (db05-15 methodology) - score?
Guyana ranks 110th and Indonesia ranks 111th of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
183 places, 1,968 data points, 2004–2014
Last refreshed

The score for registering property is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the procedures, time, cost to transfer property between two local companies, as well as the quality of land administration index that evaluates the reliability of infrastructure, transparency of information, geographic coverage, land dispute resolution and equal access to property rights. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB05-15 studies.