Honduras vs Spain: Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score

Honduras
70.11
in 2014
Spain
70.64
in 2014
Honduras rank
77th
Spain rank
76th

Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score over time

  • Honduras
  • Spain
020406080200420092014

How they compare

Spain currently reports 70.64 against 70.11 in Honduras, a difference of 0.53.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 11 shared years of data; in 2004 it was Spain ahead.

Honduras ranks 77th and Spain ranks 76th of 181 countries.

Across the 2 decades both report, Honduras averaged higher in 1 and Spain in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Honduras Spain Difference Ahead
2000s 67.65 70.59 2.95 Spain
2010s 70.17 69.34 0.8275 Honduras

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher registering property (db05-15 methodology) - score, Honduras or Spain?
Spain, at 70.64 against 70.11 in Honduras as of 2014.
What is the difference in registering property (db05-15 methodology) - score between Honduras and Spain?
0.53, with Spain ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Honduras and Spain?
11 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2014.
How do Honduras and Spain rank globally for registering property (db05-15 methodology) - score?
Honduras ranks 77th and Spain ranks 76th of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
183 places, 1,968 data points, 2004–2014
Last refreshed

The score for registering property is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the procedures, time, cost to transfer property between two local companies, as well as the quality of land administration index that evaluates the reliability of infrastructure, transparency of information, geographic coverage, land dispute resolution and equal access to property rights. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB05-15 studies.