Hong Kong (China) vs Lesotho: Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score
Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score over time
- Hong Kong (China)
- Lesotho
How they compare
Hong Kong (China) currently reports 67.47 against 66.62 in Lesotho, a difference of 0.85.
Across all 11 years both countries report, Hong Kong (China) has been ahead every year.
Hong Kong (China) ranks 87th and Lesotho ranks 90th of 183 countries.
Hong Kong (China) has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Hong Kong (China) | Lesotho | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 75.07 | 51.71 | 23.36 | Hong Kong (China) |
| 2010s | 72.32 | 58.02 | 14.29 | Hong Kong (China) |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher registering property (db05-15 methodology) - score, Hong Kong (China) or Lesotho?
- Hong Kong (China), at 67.47 against 66.62 in Lesotho as of 2014.
- What is the difference in registering property (db05-15 methodology) - score between Hong Kong (China) and Lesotho?
- 0.85, with Hong Kong (China) ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Hong Kong (China) and Lesotho?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2014.
- How do Hong Kong (China) and Lesotho rank globally for registering property (db05-15 methodology) - score?
- Hong Kong (China) ranks 87th and Lesotho ranks 90th of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for registering property is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the procedures, time, cost to transfer property between two local companies, as well as the quality of land administration index that evaluates the reliability of infrastructure, transparency of information, geographic coverage, land dispute resolution and equal access to property rights. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB05-15 studies.