Hong Kong, China vs Vanuatu: Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score
Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score over time
- Hong Kong, China
- Vanuatu
How they compare
Hong Kong, China currently reports 67.47 against 66.95 in Vanuatu, a difference of 0.52.
Across all 11 years both countries report, Hong Kong, China has been ahead every year.
Hong Kong, China ranks 87th and Vanuatu ranks 89th of 183 countries.
Hong Kong, China has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Hong Kong, China | Vanuatu | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 75.07 | 38.99 | 36.09 | Hong Kong, China |
| 2010s | 72.32 | 56.44 | 15.87 | Hong Kong, China |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher registering property (db05-15 methodology) - score, Hong Kong, China or Vanuatu?
- Hong Kong, China, at 67.47 against 66.95 in Vanuatu as of 2014.
- What is the difference in registering property (db05-15 methodology) - score between Hong Kong, China and Vanuatu?
- 0.52, with Hong Kong, China ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Hong Kong, China and Vanuatu?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2014.
- How do Hong Kong, China and Vanuatu rank globally for registering property (db05-15 methodology) - score?
- Hong Kong, China ranks 87th and Vanuatu ranks 89th of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for registering property is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the procedures, time, cost to transfer property between two local companies, as well as the quality of land administration index that evaluates the reliability of infrastructure, transparency of information, geographic coverage, land dispute resolution and equal access to property rights. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB05-15 studies.