Hungary vs Turkey: Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score

Hungary
78.04
in 2014
Turkey
76.38
in 2014
Hungary rank
47th
Turkey rank
50th

Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score over time

  • Hungary
  • Turkey
020406080200420092014

How they compare

Hungary currently reports 78.04 against 76.38 in Turkey, a difference of 1.66.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 11 shared years of data; in 2004 it was Turkey ahead.

Hungary ranks 47th and Turkey ranks 50th of 181 countries.

Across the 2 decades both report, Hungary averaged higher in 1 and Turkey in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Hungary Turkey Difference Ahead
2000s 58.63 75.61 16.98 Turkey
2010s 78.04 75.09 2.95 Hungary

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher registering property (db05-15 methodology) - score, Hungary or Turkey?
Hungary, at 78.04 against 76.38 in Turkey as of 2014.
What is the difference in registering property (db05-15 methodology) - score between Hungary and Turkey?
1.66, with Hungary ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Hungary and Turkey?
11 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2014.
How do Hungary and Turkey rank globally for registering property (db05-15 methodology) - score?
Hungary ranks 47th and Turkey ranks 50th of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
183 places, 1,968 data points, 2004–2014
Last refreshed

The score for registering property is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the procedures, time, cost to transfer property between two local companies, as well as the quality of land administration index that evaluates the reliability of infrastructure, transparency of information, geographic coverage, land dispute resolution and equal access to property rights. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB05-15 studies.