Iceland vs Qatar: Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score

Iceland
86.04
in 2014
Qatar
83.8
in 2014
Iceland rank
21st
Qatar rank
23rd

Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score over time

  • Iceland
  • Qatar
020406080200420092014

How they compare

Iceland currently reports 86.04 against 83.8 in Qatar, a difference of 2.24.

Across all 8 years both countries report, Iceland has been ahead every year.

Iceland ranks 21st and Qatar ranks 23rd of 181 countries.

Iceland has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Iceland Qatar Difference Ahead
2000s 88.63 83.8 4.83 Iceland
2010s 88.14 83.8 4.34 Iceland

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher registering property (db05-15 methodology) - score, Iceland or Qatar?
Iceland, at 86.04 against 83.8 in Qatar as of 2014.
What is the difference in registering property (db05-15 methodology) - score between Iceland and Qatar?
2.24, with Iceland ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Iceland and Qatar?
8 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2014.
How do Iceland and Qatar rank globally for registering property (db05-15 methodology) - score?
Iceland ranks 21st and Qatar ranks 23rd of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
183 places, 1,968 data points, 2004–2014
Last refreshed

The score for registering property is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the procedures, time, cost to transfer property between two local companies, as well as the quality of land administration index that evaluates the reliability of infrastructure, transparency of information, geographic coverage, land dispute resolution and equal access to property rights. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB05-15 studies.