India vs Uruguay: Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score

India
54.12
in 2014
Uruguay
54.57
in 2014
India rank
142nd
Uruguay rank
141st

Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score over time

  • India
  • Uruguay
0204060200420092014

How they compare

Uruguay currently reports 54.57 against 54.12 in India, a difference of 0.45.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 11 shared years of data; in 2004 it was Uruguay ahead.

India ranks 142nd and Uruguay ranks 141st of 181 countries.

Uruguay has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade India Uruguay Difference Ahead
2000s 50.4 53.99 3.59 Uruguay
2010s 53.23 54.57 1.34 Uruguay

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher registering property (db05-15 methodology) - score, India or Uruguay?
Uruguay, at 54.57 against 54.12 in India as of 2014.
What is the difference in registering property (db05-15 methodology) - score between India and Uruguay?
0.45, with Uruguay ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for India and Uruguay?
11 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2014.
How do India and Uruguay rank globally for registering property (db05-15 methodology) - score?
India ranks 142nd and Uruguay ranks 141st of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
183 places, 1,968 data points, 2004–2014
Last refreshed

The score for registering property is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the procedures, time, cost to transfer property between two local companies, as well as the quality of land administration index that evaluates the reliability of infrastructure, transparency of information, geographic coverage, land dispute resolution and equal access to property rights. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB05-15 studies.