Iran, Islamic Rep. vs Niger: Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score

Iran, Islamic Rep.
65.93
in 2014
Niger
65.75
in 2014
Iran, Islamic Rep. rank
94th
Niger rank
95th

Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score over time

  • Iran, Islamic Rep.
  • Niger
0204060200420092014

How they compare

Iran, Islamic Rep. currently reports 65.93 against 65.75 in Niger, a difference of 0.18.

Across all 11 years both countries report, Iran, Islamic Rep. has been ahead every year.

Iran, Islamic Rep. ranks 94th and Niger ranks 95th of 181 countries.

Iran, Islamic Rep. has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Iran, Islamic Rep. Niger Difference Ahead
2000s 65.99 56.94 9.05 Iran, Islamic Rep.
2010s 65.96 63.03 2.93 Iran, Islamic Rep.

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher registering property (db05-15 methodology) - score, Iran, Islamic Rep. or Niger?
Iran, Islamic Rep., at 65.93 against 65.75 in Niger as of 2014.
What is the difference in registering property (db05-15 methodology) - score between Iran, Islamic Rep. and Niger?
0.18, with Iran, Islamic Rep. ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Iran, Islamic Rep. and Niger?
11 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2014.
How do Iran, Islamic Rep. and Niger rank globally for registering property (db05-15 methodology) - score?
Iran, Islamic Rep. ranks 94th and Niger ranks 95th of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
183 places, 1,968 data points, 2004–2014
Last refreshed

The score for registering property is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the procedures, time, cost to transfer property between two local companies, as well as the quality of land administration index that evaluates the reliability of infrastructure, transparency of information, geographic coverage, land dispute resolution and equal access to property rights. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB05-15 studies.