Iran, Islamic Republic of vs South Africa: Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score
Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score over time
- Iran, Islamic Republic of
- South Africa
How they compare
South Africa currently reports 66.02 against 65.93 in Iran, Islamic Republic of, a difference of 0.09.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 11 shared years of data; in 2004 it was Iran, Islamic Republic of ahead.
Iran, Islamic Republic of ranks 96th and South Africa ranks 94th of 184 countries.
Iran, Islamic Republic of has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Iran, Islamic Republic of | South Africa | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 65.99 | 58.43 | 7.56 | Iran, Islamic Republic of |
| 2010s | 65.96 | 65.26 | 0.6956 | Iran, Islamic Republic of |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher registering property (db05-15 methodology) - score, Iran, Islamic Republic of or South Africa?
- South Africa, at 66.02 against 65.93 in Iran, Islamic Republic of as of 2014.
- What is the difference in registering property (db05-15 methodology) - score between Iran, Islamic Republic of and South Africa?
- 0.09, with South Africa ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Iran, Islamic Republic of and South Africa?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2014.
- How do Iran, Islamic Republic of and South Africa rank globally for registering property (db05-15 methodology) - score?
- Iran, Islamic Republic of ranks 96th and South Africa ranks 94th of 184 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for registering property is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the procedures, time, cost to transfer property between two local companies, as well as the quality of land administration index that evaluates the reliability of infrastructure, transparency of information, geographic coverage, land dispute resolution and equal access to property rights. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB05-15 studies.