Italy vs Poland: Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score

Italy
79.44
in 2014
Poland
80.3
in 2014
Italy rank
35th
Poland rank
32nd

Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score over time

  • Italy
  • Poland
020406080200420092014

How they compare

Poland currently reports 80.3 against 79.44 in Italy, a difference of 0.86.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 11 shared years of data; in 2004 it was Italy ahead.

Italy ranks 35th and Poland ranks 32nd of 181 countries.

Italy has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Italy Poland Difference Ahead
2000s 75.02 52.63 22.39 Italy
2010s 76.81 72.14 4.66 Italy

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher registering property (db05-15 methodology) - score, Italy or Poland?
Poland, at 80.3 against 79.44 in Italy as of 2014.
What is the difference in registering property (db05-15 methodology) - score between Italy and Poland?
0.86, with Poland ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Italy and Poland?
11 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2014.
How do Italy and Poland rank globally for registering property (db05-15 methodology) - score?
Italy ranks 35th and Poland ranks 32nd of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Registering property (DB05-15 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
183 places, 1,968 data points, 2004–2014
Last refreshed

The score for registering property is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the procedures, time, cost to transfer property between two local companies, as well as the quality of land administration index that evaluates the reliability of infrastructure, transparency of information, geographic coverage, land dispute resolution and equal access to property rights. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB05-15 studies.